<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg to Top Users: QUIT NOW?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryanunderdown.com/2006/11/03/digg-to-top-users-quit-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryanunderdown.com/2006/11/03/digg-to-top-users-quit-now/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hdr</title>
		<link>http://ryanunderdown.com/2006/11/03/digg-to-top-users-quit-now/#comment-62758</link>
		<dc:creator>hdr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanunderdown.com/2006/11/03/digg-to-top-users-quit-now/#comment-62758</guid>
		<description>Do DIGG editors monitor posts and bury some themselves? Ron Paul stuff gets knocked off the front page all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do DIGG editors monitor posts and bury some themselves? Ron Paul stuff gets knocked off the front page all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Letter to Kevin Rose</title>
		<link>http://ryanunderdown.com/2006/11/03/digg-to-top-users-quit-now/#comment-62511</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Letter to Kevin Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanunderdown.com/2006/11/03/digg-to-top-users-quit-now/#comment-62511</guid>
		<description>[...] Why then, we wonder, does Digg continue to snub its most prolific community members, rather than reward or even encourage them? With the latest change in Digg’s promotion algorithm, it seems that the message you are sending to the site’s most active users is that its time for them to quit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why then, we wonder, does Digg continue to snub its most prolific community members, rather than reward or even encourage them? With the latest change in Digg’s promotion algorithm, it seems that the message you are sending to the site’s most active users is that its time for them to quit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
